Geschäftskunden Kundenprogramme
Vor Ort
Merkzettel Warenkorb
Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose
Band 17

Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose

Aus der Reihe

Fr. 191.00

inkl. gesetzl. MwSt.
Versandkostenfrei
Gebundenes Buch

Gebundenes Buch

Fr. 202.00 Taschenbuch

Taschenbuch

Fr. 191.00 eBook

eBook

Fr. 187.90

Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose

Ebenfalls verfügbar als:

Gebundenes Buch

Gebundenes Buch

ab Fr. 202.00
Taschenbuch

Taschenbuch

ab Fr. 191.00
eBook

eBook

ab Fr. 187.90

Beschreibung

Details

Einband

Taschenbuch

Erscheinungsdatum

09.12.2010

Herausgeber

Umberto Albarella

Verlag

Springer Netherland

Seitenzahl

326

Beschreibung

Details

Einband

Taschenbuch

Erscheinungsdatum

09.12.2010

Herausgeber

Umberto Albarella

Verlag

Springer Netherland

Seitenzahl

326

Maße (L/B/H)

23.4/15.6/1.9 cm

Gewicht

518 g

Auflage

Softcover reprint of hardcover 1st ed. 2001

Sprache

Englisch

ISBN

978-90-481-5634-4

Weitere Bände von Environmental Science and Technology Library

Unsere Kundinnen und Kunden meinen

0.0

0 Bewertungen

Informationen zu Bewertungen

Zur Abgabe einer Bewertung ist eine Anmeldung im Konto notwendig. Die Authentizität der Bewertungen wird von uns nicht überprüft. Wir behalten uns vor, Bewertungstexte, die unseren Richtlinien widersprechen, entsprechend zu kürzen oder zu löschen.

Verfassen Sie die erste Bewertung zu diesem Artikel

Helfen Sie anderen Kund*innen durch Ihre Meinung

Erste Bewertung verfassen

Unsere Kundinnen und Kunden meinen

0.0

0 Bewertungen filtern
  • Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose
  • Preface; U. Albarella.
    Introduction. Exploring the real Nature of environmental archaeology. An introduction; U. Albarella.
    Meaning and Purpose. Economic prehistory or environmental archaeology? On gaining a sense of identity; T. O'Connor. Re-inventing environmental archaeology. A comment on `Economic prehistory or environmental archaeology? On gaining a sense of identity'; Y. Hamilakis. Whose dichotomy is it anyway? A reply to Hamilakis; T. O'Connor. Environmental archaeology is not human palaeoecology; J. Driver. Environmental archaeology is dead: long live bioarchaeology, geoarchaeology and human palaeoecology. A comment on `Environmental archaeology is not human palaeoecology'; K. Thomas. A reply to Thomas; J. Driver. The poverty of empiricism and the tyranny of theory; S. Roskams, T. Saunders. Commercialising the palaeoenvironment. Developer funding and environmental archaeology; G. Hughes, A. Hammon. The responsibilities of archaeologists to nature conservation; R. Roseff. Sustainability and the rate of change. A comment on `The responsibilities of archaeologists to nature conservation'; P. Graves-Brown. A reply to Graves-Brown; R. Roseff. What is geoarchaeology? Re-examining the relationship between archaeology and earth sciences; M. Canti. Is human osteoarchaeology environmental archaeology? J.S. Derevenski.
    Case Studies. The rhetoric of people and grains; D. Gheorghiu. A match made in heaven or a marriage of convenience? The problems and rewards of integrating palaeoecological and archaeological data; C. Loveluck, K. Dobney. Historical archaeology and new directions in environmental archaeology. Examples from Neolithic Scandinavia and Venezuela (400-1400 AD); S. Koerner, R. Gassón. Can't seethe wood for the trees. Interpreting woodland fire history from microscopic charcoal; J. Moore. The potential for using religious belief to derive environmental information on past societies, with a case study on the environment of Attica; R. Shiel. Reconstructing house activity areas; H. Smith, P. Marshall, M.P. Pearson. Environmental archaeology and the interpretation of social space. A comment on `Reconstructing house activity areas'; K. Milek. When method meets theory. The use and misuse of cereal producer/consumer models in archaeobotany; W. Smith. Producers and consumers in archaeobotany. A comment on `When method meets theory: the use and misuse of cereal producer/consumer models in archaeobotany'; C. Bakels.
    Conclusions. Agendas for environmental archaeology; G. Barker.
    Index.