Assuring that low-income children have health coverage would seem to be a non-controversial and popular issue. Yet the fate of the federal State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) has been marked by ideological conflict and two presidential vetoes. Why? Alice Sardell answers this question through an examination of the policy legacies and decisions that shaped SCHIP, the advocacy strategies that created it, and the actors who interacted to either support or oppose its expansion.
Kundinnen und Kunden meinen
0.0/5.0
0 Bewertungen
Verfassen Sie die erste Bewertung zu diesem Artikel