Produktbild: Controversies in Spine Surgery, MIS versus OPEN

Controversies in Spine Surgery, MIS versus OPEN Best Evidence Recommendations

Fr. 188.00

inkl. gesetzl. MwSt., Versandkostenfrei


Beschreibung

Produktdetails

Einband

Gebundene Ausgabe

Erscheinungsdatum

11.04.2018

Abbildungen

51 Abb.

Herausgeber

Alexander R. Vaccaro + weitere

Verlag

Thieme Medical Publishers

Seitenzahl

264

Maße (L/B/H)

28.7/22.3/1.7 cm

Gewicht

1089 g

Auflage

1. Auflage

Sprache

Englisch

ISBN

978-1-60406-881-8

Beschreibung

Produktdetails

Einband

Gebundene Ausgabe

Erscheinungsdatum

11.04.2018

Abbildungen

51 Abb.

Herausgeber

Verlag

Thieme Medical Publishers

Seitenzahl

264

Maße (L/B/H)

28.7/22.3/1.7 cm

Gewicht

1089 g

Auflage

1. Auflage

Sprache

Englisch

ISBN

978-1-60406-881-8

EU-Ansprechpartner

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50
70469 Stuttgart
DE
info@thieme.de

Herstelleradresse

Thieme Medical Publishers
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor
10001 New York
US
customerservice@thieme.com

Noch keine Bewertungen vorhanden

Verfassen Sie die erste Bewertung zu diesem Artikel

Helfen Sie anderen Kundinnen und Kunden durch Ihre Meinung.

Kundinnen und Kunden meinen

Bewertungen (0)

Die Leseprobe wird geladen.
  • Produktbild: Controversies in Spine Surgery, MIS versus OPEN
  • Part I: Degenerative
    1 Lumbar Discectomy: Is Tubular or Endoscopic Discectomy Better Than Traditional Microdiscectomies?
    2 Is Lumbar Stenosis Best Treated with an Open Laminectomy?
    3 Facet Cysts: Is There an Advantage to Treating Synovial Cysts with Minimally Invasive Techniques?
    4 Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Minimally Invasive versus Open
    5 The Lateral Transpsoas Approach versus ALIF: Do the Risks of Lateral Interbody Fusion Outweigh the Benefits Compared to Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    6 Is AxiaLIF Comparable to Open Fusion with ALIF and Posterolateral 360° Fusion at L5–S1?
    7 Multiple-Level Interbody Fusion: How Do Two-Level Fusion Techniques Compare between Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery?
    8 Is Lumbar Adjacent Segment Degeneration Best Treated Using Minimally Invasive Surgery over Open Fusion Techniques?
    9 Degenerative Scoliosis: Is There an Advantage to Using Minimally Invasive Techniques to Treat Degenerative Scoliosis?
    10 Flatback Syndrome: Can Lumbar Flatback Syndrome Be Treated Adequately with Minimally Invasive Techniques?
    11 Can Thoracic Disc Herniation Be Effectively Treated Using Minimally Invasive Techniques?
    12 Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy
    13 Complications of Instrumentation: Is There a Higher Complication Rate in Placing Instrumentation via a Minimally Invasive Technique Compared with an Open Technique?
    14 Dural Tears: Should a Minimally Invasive Complication Such as a Dural Tear Routinely Be Opened for Adequate Repair or Are There Safe and Reliable Minimally Invasive Techniques for Dural Closure?
    15 Do Minimally Invasive Techniques Broaden the Scope for Geriatric Spine Surgery?
    Part II: Trauma
    16 Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: Can Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Be Effectively Managed Using Minimally Invasive Surgery Techniques?
    17 Open and Minimally Invasive Treatment of Cervical Spine Fractures
    Part III: Tumor
    18 Thoracolumbar Metastatic Tumors: Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery versus Open Techniques for Addressing Thoracolumbar Metastatic Tumor Resection and Stabilization
    19 Intradural Spine Tumors: Is There an Advantage to Removing Intradural Spine Tumors Using an MIS Approach?
    20 Quality of Life in Advanced Tumors: Can Minimally Invasive Surgery Techniques Improve the Quality of Life of Patients with Advanced Oncologic Disease to Allow for Decreased Pain or Should Traditional Techniques of Palliation Be Used?
    Part IV: Other Issues
    21 Radiation Exposure: How Does Radiation Exposure Differ between Open and Minimally Invasive Techniques?
    22 Infection Rates: How Do Infection Rates Compare between MIS and Open Spine Techniques?
    23 Cost: Which Costs More, Open or Minimally Invasive Surgery?
    24 Success Rates and Time: Can Three-Dimensional Navigational Imaging Improve the Success and Time Required for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Minimize Radiation Exposure to Those in the OR Suite?