Geschäftskunden Kundenprogramme
Vor Ort
Merkzettel Warenkorb

Gutscheinbedingungen

*Gültig bis 20.07.2026 auf alle Bücher. Ausgeschlossen sind Zeitschriften, Prozentbücher und Abos | Einlösbar in allen Buchhandlungen von Orell Füssli, Barth Bücher, Buchladen Rapunzel, Papeterie Köhler, Schuler Orell Füssli, Stauffacher und ZAP unter Vorweisung des Gutscheins, auf www.orellfüssli.ch durch Eingabe des Gutscheincodes. Beim Service „eBooks verschenken“ und bei eBook-Käufen via eReader nicht einlösbar | Mindesteinkaufswert: Fr. 30.- | Nicht mit anderen Rabatten kumulierbar.
Produktbild: Constitutional Structure Of Eu

Constitutional Structure Of Eu and Justice and the Right to Justificatio

Aus der Reihe Hart Studies in Security and J

Fr. 68.90

inkl. gesetzl. MwSt., Versandkostenfrei

Beschreibung

Produktdetails

Einband

Taschenbuch

Erscheinungsdatum

19.11.2020

Herausgeber

Ben Saul + weitere

Verlag

Hart Publishing

Seitenzahl

200

Maße (L/B/H)

23.4/15.6/1.1 cm

Gewicht

290 g

Sprache

Englisch

ISBN

978-1-5099-4573-3

Beschreibung

Produktdetails

Einband

Taschenbuch

Erscheinungsdatum

19.11.2020

Herausgeber

Verlag

Hart Publishing

Seitenzahl

200

Maße (L/B/H)

23.4/15.6/1.1 cm

Gewicht

290 g

Sprache

Englisch

ISBN

978-1-5099-4573-3

Noch keine Bewertungen vorhanden

Verfassen Sie die erste Bewertung zu diesem Artikel

Helfen Sie anderen Kundinnen und Kunden durch Ihre Meinung.

Kundinnen und Kunden meinen

Bewertungen (0)
  • Produktbild: Constitutional Structure Of Eu
  • PART I 1. Introduction I. The Idea of the Book II. The Structure of the Book III. Why Constitutionalism Matters for Constructing the AFSJ Sphere IV. Introduction to the Contested Concept of Justice and the EU Security Status Quo V. Justice, EU Legal Debate and the External Aspect VI. Conclusion 2. The Concept of Non-domination in the EU Security-related Context I. Introduction II. The Concept of ‘Freedom as Non-domination’ as a Constitutional Set-up: Charting the Main Debate III. Non-domination, Justice and EU Security Regulation IV. Legitimacy and Justification V. Judicial Review and Non-domination VI. Translating the ‘Non-domination’ Question to the Supranational EU Level and its Relevance for EU Security Regulation VII. Introduction to the Links between Justification and Proportionality in the Context of Non-domination VIII. Conclusion PART II 3. The Right to Justification, Justice and the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice I. Introduction II. Justice as a Contested Concept III. Justice and on the Constitutional Structure IV. The Idea of Justification, Democracy and the Question of Legitimacy V. The Ideal and Non-ideal Picture of Justice VI. Constitutional Essentials, Public Reason and Judicial Review II. Same for States and Citizens? The EU Context VIII. Conclusion 4. Proportionality and Reasonable Disagreement in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice I. Introduction II. Proportionality in the AFSJ and Beyond III. Proportionality Discourse: Introductory Remarks to a Grand Debate IV. An Umbrella Principle of Proportionality in EU Law V. Proportionality on the EU Legislative Table VI. The New Contours of Proportionality within the AFSJ: Case Law VII. Critique and Appraisal of the Principle VIII. The Turn to Justification: Proportionality as Reasonable Disagreement IX. Proportionality and Justice as a Force for Good AFSJ Structure? X. Conclusion: Non-domination Utilised Through Proportionality? PART III 5. The Right to Justification, Territoriality and Migration, Refugees and Terrorism I. Introduction II. The Decent Society and its Borders: Some Key Debates Explored III. Migration Ethics and the AFSJ Challenge IV. Anti-terrorism, Security and Prevention V. Adjudication and Security in Real Time VI. Agencies and the Accountability Deficit VII. What Kind of Justification for What Kind of Solidarity? VIII. Conclusion 6. The Dimensions of Constitutional Justice: The Multi-Speed Scenario I. Introduction II. Justice and Fragmentation: Cherry-picking AFSJ Standards III. Constitutional Justice, Trust and the CJEU IV. The Court of Justice as a Trustee Court in the AFSJ? V. National Courts and Fiduciary Obligations: When the EU Standard is not Robust Enough VI. Conclusion 7. Conclusion I. Conclusion II. The Justification of the Book