Geschäftskunden Kundenprogramme
Vor Ort
Merkzettel Warenkorb

Gutscheinbedingungen

*Gültig bis 20.09.2026 auf (fast) alles. Ausgeschlossen sind Smartboxen, Zeitschriften, Tickets, Lebensmittel, Gaming-Elektroartikel, Tinte/Toner, Gutscheine, Geschenkkarten, Blumen und Abos | Einlösbar in allen Buchhandlungen von Orell Füssli, Barth Bücher, Buchladen Rapunzel, Schuler Orell Füssli, Stauffacher und ZAP unter Vorweisung des Gutscheins, auf www.orellfüssli.ch durch Eingabe des Gutscheincodes. Beim Service „eBooks verschenken“ und bei eBook-Käufen via eReader nicht einlösbar | Mindesteinkaufswert: Fr. 100.- | Nicht mit anderen Rabatten kumulierbar.
  • Produktbild: European Parliament and Delegated Legislation
  • Produktbild: European Parliament and Delegated Legislation

European Parliament and Delegated Legislation An Institutional Balance Perspective

Fr. 129.00

inkl. gesetzl. MwSt., Versandkostenfrei

Beschreibung

Produktdetails

Einband

Gebundene Ausgabe

Erscheinungsdatum

01.11.2022

Herausgeber

Nicola Lupo + weitere

Verlag

Hart Publishing

Seitenzahl

232

Maße (L/B/H)

25/17.5/1.7 cm

Gewicht

587 g

Sprache

Englisch

ISBN

978-1-5099-3185-9

Beschreibung

Produktdetails

Einband

Gebundene Ausgabe

Erscheinungsdatum

01.11.2022

Herausgeber

Verlag

Hart Publishing

Seitenzahl

232

Maße (L/B/H)

25/17.5/1.7 cm

Gewicht

587 g

Sprache

Englisch

ISBN

978-1-5099-3185-9

Herstelleradresse

Libri GmbH
Europaallee 1
36244 Bad Hersfeld
DE

Email: gpsr@libri.de

Noch keine Bewertungen vorhanden

Verfassen Sie die erste Bewertung zu diesem Artikel

Helfen Sie anderen Kundinnen und Kunden durch Ihre Meinung.

Kundinnen und Kunden meinen

Bewertungen (0)
Die Leseprobe wird geladen.
  • Produktbild: European Parliament and Delegated Legislation
  • Produktbild: European Parliament and Delegated Legislation

  • 1. Introduction
    I. A Primer: Operationalising Institutional Balance as a Yardstick for Assessing Institutional Developments
    A. Devising an Institutional Balance Test
    B. Applying the Institutional Balance Test to Identify Constitutional Modifications
    II. Structure of the Enquiry

    2. A Formal Reading of the Lisbon Treaty
    I. The Formal Catalogue of Acts
    II. The Lisbon Treaty's 'Atypical' Acts
    III. The Distinction between Delegated and Implementing Acts:
    A Cursory Reading of the TFEU
    A. Key Features of Article 290 TFEU
    B. Key Features of Article 291 TFEU
    IV. Parliamentary Control Over Post-Lisbon Executive Acts

    3. The Road Leading Up to the Lisbon Treaty
    I. Comitology's Origins and Original Sin
    II. Judicial Sanctioning of Comitology and the Commission's Broad Implementing Powers
    III. From the Single European Act to the 2006 Revision of the Second Comitology Decision
    A. Codification: The SEA and the First Comitology Decision
    B. A Call for Parliamentarisation and the Second Comitology Decision
    C. The Constitution and the Amendment of the Second Comitology Decision
    IV. A Recalibrated Institutional Balance

    4. The Exponential Multiplication of Delimitation Problems
    I. Delimitation of Autonomous Executive Acts against (Delegated) Legislation and Implementation
    A. Autonomous Executive Acts vs Legislation
    B. Autonomous Executive Acts vs Implementation
    C. Institutional Implications
    II. Delimitation of Legislation and Delegation
    III. Delimitation of Delegated and Implementing Acts
    A. Judicial Clarifications in Biocides, Eures Network and Visa Reciprocity
    B. Amendments as Implementation
    C. The PRAC, a Zombie in EU Law
    D. The 2019 Inter-Institutional Agreement
    E. Legislative Practice in Light of the 2019 IIA

    5. Delegated Power: Further Limits and Procedure
    I. The Passive Personal Scope of Article 290 TFEU
    II. Breaking Down the Specificity Requirement
    A. Duration and Objectives
    B. Content and Scope
    III. Testing Specificity in Practice
    IV. Procedural Limits to the Exercise of Delegated Powers
    A. The Drafting of Delegated Acts
    B. The Control Exercised by the Legislator: Objection and Revocation

    6. Implementing Power: Triggering Factors, Nature, Extent and Procedure
    I. The Notion of Uniform Conditions
    II. Reconceptualising Implementing Powers Post-Lisbon
    A. May Implementing Acts Implement Delegated Acts?
    B. The Nature and Extent of Implementing Powers under Article 291 TFEU
    C. The Eures Network Standard as the Single Standard for Implementation
    D. The Institutions' Constitutional Modification of Article 291(2) TFEU
    III. Exceptional Implementation by the Council
    A. CFSP Implementation by the Council
    B. Duly Justified Specific Cases of Implementation by the Council
    C. Implementation by the European Council
    IV. The (not so) Closed List of Implementing actors and Implementing Acts
    A. EU Agencies
    B. Sui Generis Implementing Acts
    V. The Comitology Procedures
    A. The Proposal for and Negotiations on the Comitology Regulation
    B. The Comitology Regulation
    C. The Functioning of the Post-Lisbon Comitology Regime
    D. The European Parliament's Droit de Regard
    VI. No Self-Love, the 2017 Proposal to Amend the Comitology Regulation

    7. The Practice and Politics of Delegated Legislation
    I. Strategies in Delegating Powers
    A. Adding Levels and Strategies to the Model
    B. Testing the Model
    II. General Data Protection Regulation
    A. The Commission's Proposal
    B. The Trilogues and the Resulting Text of the GDPR
    C. Assessment
    III. Data Governance Act
    A. The Commission's Proposal
    B. The Trilogues and the Resulting Text of the Data Governance Act
    C. Assessment
    IV. Refining the Model

    8. Conclusion
    I. Looking Back .
    II. . to Move Forward
    Annex: Overview of Autonomous Executive Legal Bases