Geschäftskunden Kundenprogramme
Vor Ort
Merkzettel Warenkorb
Produktbild: Article 47 of the EU Charter and Effective Judicial Protecti

Article 47 of the EU Charter and Effective Judicial Protecti The Court of Justice's Perspective

Fr. 79.90

inkl. gesetzl. MwSt., Versandkostenfrei

Beschreibung

Produktdetails

Einband

Taschenbuch

Erscheinungsdatum

20.06.2024

Herausgeber

Matteo Bonelli + weitere

Verlag

Hart Publishing

Seitenzahl

328

Maße (L/B/H)

23.4/15.6/2.5 cm

Gewicht

480 g

Sprache

Englisch

ISBN

978-1-5099-4798-0

Beschreibung

Produktdetails

Einband

Taschenbuch

Erscheinungsdatum

20.06.2024

Herausgeber

Verlag

Hart Publishing

Seitenzahl

328

Maße (L/B/H)

23.4/15.6/2.5 cm

Gewicht

480 g

Sprache

Englisch

ISBN

978-1-5099-4798-0

Kundinnen und Kunden meinen

0 Bewertungen

Informationen zu Bewertungen

Zur Abgabe einer Bewertung ist eine Anmeldung im Konto notwendig. Die Authentizität der Bewertungen wird von uns nicht überprüft. Wir behalten uns vor, Bewertungstexte, die unseren Richtlinien widersprechen, entsprechend zu kürzen oder zu löschen.

Die Bewertungen sind nach Format, Anzahl Sterne und Datum sortiert.

Verfassen Sie die erste Bewertung zu diesem Artikel

Helfen Sie anderen Kund*innen durch Ihre Meinung

Kundinnen und Kunden meinen

0 Bewertungen filtern
Die Leseprobe wird geladen.
  • Produktbild: Article 47 of the EU Charter and Effective Judicial Protecti
  • Introduction Matteo Bonelli (Maastricht University, the Netherlands), Mariolina Eliantonio (Maastricht University, the Netherlands), and Giulia Gentile (London School of Economics, UK) Part 1 The Constitutional Dimension of Article 47 of the Charter 1. Article 19 TEU and National Courts: A New Role for the Principle of Effective Judicial Protection? Sacha Prechal (Utrecht University, the Netherlands) 2. Searching for the Pieces of the EU Justice Puzzle: Articles 47, 48, 49 and 50 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Giulia Gentile (London School of Economics, UK), and Serena Menzione (KU Leuven, Belgium) 3. Effective Judicial Protection before National Courts: Article 47 of the Charter, National Constitutional Remedies and the Preliminary Reference Procedure Anna Wallerman Ghavanini (University of Gothenburg, Sweden), and Clara Rauchegger (University of Innsbruck, Austria) 4. The EU Right to an Independent Judge: How Much Consensus Across the EU? Michal Krajewski (University of Copenhagen, Denmark) 5. Article 47 of the Charter, Effective Judicial Protection and the (Procedural) Autonomy of the Member States Matteo Bonelli (Maastricht University, the Netherlands) 6. ‘A Spectre is Haunting Kirchberg’ – The Spectre of Article 47: The CJEU Case Law on the Finality of Judicial Decisions and on the Ex Officio Application of EU Law Mariolina Eliantonio (Maastricht University, the Netherlands) Part 2 Article 47 of the Charter in Selected Policy Areas 7. The Role of Article 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in the Field of Non-Discrimination: Onwards and Upwards Kathleen Gutman (Court of Justice of the European Union, Luxembourg) 8. No Turning Back? The Empowerment of National Asylum and Migration Courts under Article 47 of the Charter Marcelle Reneman (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands) 9. Article 47 of the Charter and the European Arrest Warrant: Chronicle of a Death Foretold? Adriano Martufi (Leiden Law School, Belgium) 10. Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights in the Common Foreign and Security Policy: Does it Afford an Adequate Protection of the Right to Effective Judicial Protection to Private Parties? Sara Poli (University of Pisa, Italy) 11. Article 47 of the Charter and Effective Judicial Protection in Environmental Matters: The Need to Grant Civil Society the Right to Defend the Environment Ludwig Krämer (European Commission) 12. Article 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in the Field of Public Procurement: Time to Take the Charter Seriously? Roberto Caranta (University of Turin, Italy) 13. Article 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in EU Competition Enforcement: A Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment Andriani Kalintiri (King’s College London, UK) 14. The Evolution of the Right to an Effective Remedy and to a Fair Trial in Direct and Indirect Taxation: Are We There Yet? Katerina Pantazatou (University of Luxembourg) 15. Conclusions Matteo Bonelli (Maastricht University, the Netherlands), Mariolina Eliantonio (Maastricht University, the Netherlands), and Giulia Gentile (London School of Economics, UK)