Hidden Lines on the Map Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact Stalin and Hitler's Secret Division of Eastern Europe
-
- Einzelkauf Download ausgewählt
-
Sprache:Englisch
Fr. 10.00
inkl. gesetzl. MwSt.Beschreibung
Produktdetails
Format
ePUB
Kopierschutz
Nein
Family Sharing
Ja
Text-to-Speech
Ja
Altersempfehlung
1 - 99 Jahr(e)
Erscheinungsdatum
18.05.2026
Verlag
EpubliSeitenzahl
158 (Printausgabe)
Dateigröße
1560 KB
Auflage
2. Auflage
Sprache
Englisch
EAN
9783565448852
The first mechanism examined is the controlled dissemination of secret information within the German Foreign Office and the Soviet People's Commissariat for Foreign Affairs. The protocol's existence was known only to a tiny inner circle, creating a tightly compartmentalized flow that prevented leaks but also limited broader institutional buy-in. This concentration of knowledge meant that diplomatic staff operating outside the inner circle continued to negotiate public agreements unaware of the underlying territorial carve-up, creating a mismatch between formal negotiations and actual strategic intentions.
The second mechanism concerns decision-making hierarchies at the highest level, where Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler treated the secret protocol as a binding commitment that allowed each to pursue immediate goals, Hitler's invasion of Poland and Soviet security buffers, while publicly maintaining a façade of non-aggression. The hierarchical approval process ensured that once the leaders signed, lower-level officials had to implement the territorial shifts, even when it conflicted with prior understandings or public statements.
The third mechanism involves incentive structures shaped by the promised territorial gains. Germany received a free hand in western Poland and secured its eastern flank, while the USSR obtained spheres of influence over the Baltic states, Bessarabia, and eastern Poland, which it later used to justify invasions and annexations. These allocations altered the cost-benefit calculations for both regimes, making the secret protocol a high-reward, low-risk instrument in their strategic toolkit, at least until ideological conflict rendered it obsolete.
The second mechanism concerns decision-making hierarchies at the highest level, where Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler treated the secret protocol as a binding commitment that allowed each to pursue immediate goals, Hitler's invasion of Poland and Soviet security buffers, while publicly maintaining a façade of non-aggression. The hierarchical approval process ensured that once the leaders signed, lower-level officials had to implement the territorial shifts, even when it conflicted with prior understandings or public statements.
The third mechanism involves incentive structures shaped by the promised territorial gains. Germany received a free hand in western Poland and secured its eastern flank, while the USSR obtained spheres of influence over the Baltic states, Bessarabia, and eastern Poland, which it later used to justify invasions and annexations. These allocations altered the cost-benefit calculations for both regimes, making the secret protocol a high-reward, low-risk instrument in their strategic toolkit, at least until ideological conflict rendered it obsolete.
Noch keine Bewertungen vorhanden
Verfassen Sie die erste Bewertung zu diesem Artikel
Helfen Sie anderen Kundinnen und Kunden durch Ihre Meinung.